Abstract

Early human food cultures were plant-based. Major religions such as Hinduism and Buddhism have recommended a vegetarian style of life since their formulation. The recorded history of vegetarian diet started in the sixth century bc by followers of the Orphic mysteries. The Greek philosopher Pythagoras is considered the begetter of ethical vegetarianism. The Pythagorean way of life was followed by a number of important personalities and influenced vegetarian nutrition until the 19th century. In Europe, vegetarian diet more than or less disappeared during the Middle Ages. In the Renaissance era and in the Age of Enlightenment, various personalities skilful vegetarianism. The start vegetarian society was started in England in 1847. The International Vegetarian Gild was founded in 1908 and the first vegan society began in 1944. Prominent vegetarians during this time included Sylvester Graham, John Harvey Kellogg, and Maximilian Bircher-Benner. A prototype shift occurred at the turn of the 21st century. The former prejudices that vegetarianism leads to malnutrition were replaced past scientific evidence showing that vegetarian diet reduces the take a chance of about contemporary diseases. Today, vegetarian nutrition has a growing international following and is increasingly accepted. The main reasons for this trend are health concerns and ethical, ecologic, and social issues. The future of vegetarian diet is promising considering sustainable diet is crucial for the well-existence of humankind. An increasing number of people exercise not want animals to endure nor do they want climatic change; they want to avert preventable diseases and to secure a livable futurity for generations to come.

INTRODUCTION

In this article, the term vegetarian nutrition refers to all forms of this diet. Whenever vegan, raw food, or related diets are implied, this is explicitly mentioned.

The anatomic and physiologic characteristics of carnivores and herbivores in the brute kingdom compared with the characteristics of humans show that humans are omnivores past nature (1). All the same, constitute foods may be the most of import nutrient source for human health (two–five).

In former times, plants and their fruit were near likely e'er available, and they were easy to gather. Hunting animals was difficult and often dangerous, so that fauna products were probably only consumed sporadically, except for short periods such equally in the Paleolithic Era. Information technology is likely that the consumption of minor and deadening-moving animals, eggs, fish, and possibly os marrow and feces may have played a function in the development of the human brain. With the introduction of agriculture, homo diets became increasingly plant-centered.

THE HISTORY OF VEGETARIAN NUTRITION

The data on the early on phase of vegetarian nutrition are fragmentary and are not always consistent. Some helpful information tin can be derived from the writings of historical authors (6). Information technology is fairly articulate that major early on human cultures practiced a predominantly plant-based diet, but the precise historical extent of vegetarianism remains unknown (Tabular array ane).

Table 1

Staple foods of important early on human cultures 1

Culture Staple foods
Arab republic of egypt Wheat, barley
China Wheat, soya, sorghum
India Corn, rice, wheat, lentils
Heart Due east Wheat, chickpeas
Mexico, Mayas Corn/maize, amaranth
Peru, Incas Potatoes, quinoa
Culture Staple foods
Egypt Wheat, barley
People's republic of china Wheat, soya, sorghum
Bharat Corn, rice, wheat, lentils
Heart Eastward Wheat, chickpeas
Mexico, Mayas Corn/maize, amaranth
Peru, Incas Potatoes, quinoa

Table i

Staple foods of important early human cultures 1

Civilization Staple foods
Egypt Wheat, barley
China Wheat, soya, sorghum
Republic of india Corn, rice, wheat, lentils
Middle E Wheat, chickpeas
United mexican states, Mayas Corn/maize, amaranth
Republic of peru, Incas Potatoes, quinoa
Culture Staple foods
Arab republic of egypt Wheat, barley
China Wheat, soya, sorghum
India Corn, rice, wheat, lentils
Middle East Wheat, chickpeas
Mexico, Mayas Corn/maize, amaranth
Peru, Incas Potatoes, quinoa

Many major religions include certain rules with regard to what to swallow and drinkable and rules about conduct toward animals, ranging from kind treatment to an equal standing with humans. These rules remain influential in many religions and cultures to the nowadays time.

The oldest written documents on vegetarianism in Europe engagement back to the sixth century bc past followers of the Orphic mysteries. This religious group banned the sacrifice of animals and the consumption of meat and refused to eat anything animal-based (including eggs). At approximately the aforementioned time, the Greek philosopher and mathematician Pythagoras developed his ideas almost reincarnation, which led to the avoidance of the consumption of meat. He is considered the father of ethical vegetarianism and his name gave rising to the term Pythagorean way of life. The Pythagorean way of life was embraced by a number of prominent classical philosophers and writers (Tabular array two) and influenced nutrition in Europe until the 19th century.

Tabular array 2

Famous vegetarians in ancient Greece 1

Name Profession Dates of birth and death Reference to vegetarianism
Pythagoras Greek philosopher and mathematician 570–500 bc Considered the founder of ethical vegetarianism. He recommended animal food but from living organisms (milk, eggs).
Plato Greek philosopher 428–348 bc In his volume Politeia, he suggested that town people exist vegetarian to stay healthy. Only meat eaters living in the country need a doc.
Xenokrates Greek philosopher 395–314 bc Wrote the start paper on vegetarianism (non preserved, documented by other Greek writers).
Theophrastus Greek philosopher 370–287 bc Believed that humans and animals are related to one another physically and mentally.
Apolloius Greek philosopher and preacher 40–90 advertising Was considered the first documented prominent vegan.
Ovid Roman poet 47 bc to 17 advertizing In his book Metamorphosis he provided strong arguments against eating meat.
Plutarch Greek poet 45–120 ad Wrote the first paper on vegetarianism that is preserved. In his book Moralia he recommends respecting animals.
Plotin Egyptian/Greek philosopher 205–270 ad Revived the Pythagorean way of life.
Porphyrios Greek author 234–305 ad Wrote the first book on vegetarians that has been preserved.
Name Profession Dates of birth and expiry Reference to vegetarianism
Pythagoras Greek philosopher and mathematician 570–500 bc Considered the founder of ethical vegetarianism. He recommended brute food only from living organisms (milk, eggs).
Plato Greek philosopher 428–348 bc In his book Politeia, he suggested that town people exist vegetarian to stay salubrious. Simply meat eaters living in the state need a dr..
Xenokrates Greek philosopher 395–314 bc Wrote the beginning paper on vegetarianism (not preserved, documented by other Greek writers).
Theophrastus Greek philosopher 370–287 bc Believed that humans and animals are related to one another physically and mentally.
Apolloius Greek philosopher and preacher 40–90 advertising Was considered the starting time documented prominent vegan.
Ovid Roman poet 47 bc to 17 ad In his volume Metamorphosis he provided strong arguments against eating meat.
Plutarch Greek poet 45–120 ad Wrote the first paper on vegetarianism that is preserved. In his volume Moralia he recommends respecting animals.
Plotin Egyptian/Greek philosopher 205–270 advertizing Revived the Pythagorean manner of life.
Porphyrios Greek author 234–305 advertizing Wrote the first book on vegetarians that has been preserved.

Tabular array 2

Famous vegetarians in ancient Greece i

Name Profession Dates of nascence and decease Reference to vegetarianism
Pythagoras Greek philosopher and mathematician 570–500 bc Considered the founder of ethical vegetarianism. He recommended beast food only from living organisms (milk, eggs).
Plato Greek philosopher 428–348 bc In his book Politeia, he suggested that town people be vegetarian to stay healthy. Just meat eaters living in the land need a doctor.
Xenokrates Greek philosopher 395–314 bc Wrote the first paper on vegetarianism (non preserved, documented past other Greek writers).
Theophrastus Greek philosopher 370–287 bc Believed that humans and animals are related to one another physically and mentally.
Apolloius Greek philosopher and preacher 40–90 ad Was considered the first documented prominent vegan.
Ovid Roman poet 47 bc to 17 ad In his book Metamorphosis he provided strong arguments confronting eating meat.
Plutarch Greek poet 45–120 advertizing Wrote the first paper on vegetarianism that is preserved. In his book Moralia he recommends respecting animals.
Plotin Egyptian/Greek philosopher 205–270 advertizing Revived the Pythagorean way of life.
Porphyrios Greek author 234–305 ad Wrote the outset book on vegetarians that has been preserved.
Name Profession Dates of birth and death Reference to vegetarianism
Pythagoras Greek philosopher and mathematician 570–500 bc Considered the founder of ethical vegetarianism. He recommended fauna food simply from living organisms (milk, eggs).
Plato Greek philosopher 428–348 bc In his book Politeia, he suggested that town people be vegetarian to stay good for you. Simply meat eaters living in the state need a physician.
Xenokrates Greek philosopher 395–314 bc Wrote the beginning paper on vegetarianism (non preserved, documented by other Greek writers).
Theophrastus Greek philosopher 370–287 bc Believed that humans and animals are related to one another physically and mentally.
Apolloius Greek philosopher and preacher 40–90 ad Was considered the first documented prominent vegan.
Ovid Roman poet 47 bc to 17 ad In his book Metamorphosis he provided stiff arguments against eating meat.
Plutarch Greek poet 45–120 advertizing Wrote the first paper on vegetarianism that is preserved. In his book Moralia he recommends respecting animals.
Plotin Egyptian/Greek philosopher 205–270 ad Revived the Pythagorean mode of life.
Porphyrios Greek author 234–305 ad Wrote the first book on vegetarians that has been preserved.

Virtually of the reasons given for practicing vegetarian diet accept hardly changed over the by 2.5 millennia. The ancient Greeks believed that animals were related to humans and that they were able to communicate and recollect. Information technology was held that humans are legally responsible for animals and that killing them meant injustice and harm. The ancient Greeks were of the stance that fauna welfare taught humans virtually humanitarianism and they believed in reincarnation. The ancient Greeks observed that eating meat can exist harmful to wellness and felt that it influenced the mind. They were of the opinion that plant food was supposed to cleanse the soul and that vegetarianism leads to an alignment with the gods. Also, they knew that in that location was enough food without eating meat (vi).

There are no records of vegetarian nutrition in Europe later the ancient Greek and ancient Roman periods (6th century ad). In the Renaissance era, Leonardo da Vinci practiced vegetarian nutrition. He was convinced that "the time will come when we condemn the eating of animals, just as today we condemn the eating of our own kind, the eating of humans." During the Age of Enlightenment, individuals such as Tyron, Rousseau, Voltaire, Wesley, and many others practiced vegetarian nutrition. The number of vegetarians at that time is unknown but it was probably small-scale. Many people who ate mainly plant food probably did and then for fiscal reasons.

In 1847, the first vegetarian guild was started in England. The American Vegetarian Gild was founded in 1850 and the German Vegetarian Social club was initiated in 1867, followed by the institution of vegetarian societies in many other countries. The International Vegetarian Union was started in Dresden in 1908; the offset Vegan Society began in Leicester, England, in 1944; and the European Vegetarian Union was established in Brussels in 1985.

These developments were fostered by prominent representatives of vegetarian nutrition such as Sylvester Graham (United States, 1784–1851; invented Graham staff of life, based on whole-grain flour, and recommended eating raw food); John Harvey Kellogg (Usa physician, 1853–1943; invented cornflakes and patented a procedure for making peanut butter); Maximilian Bircher-Benner (Swiss doc, 1867–1939; invented muesli, speculated well-nigh phytochemicals in institute foods).

During this time there were as well some eminent vegetarians, such as George Bernard Shaw, an Irish playwright (1856–1950), who said "Animals are my friends, and I don't eat my friends." The Indian statesman Mohandas Mahatma Gandhi (1869–1948) said, "At that place is enough for everybody'southward feed, simply not enough for everybody's greed." Albert Einstein, the German-US physicist (1875–1955) believed that "Nothing volition increase the chances of survival for life on world as much every bit the evolution to a vegetarian diet" and Albert Schweitzer, German doc (1875–1965), said, "We must renounce meat consumption and speak up confronting it."

Contempo VEGETARIAN Nutrition

In the final decades of the 20th century, constitute-based nutrition became a topic of formal scientific inquiry. The attempt to identify the most beneficial diets for humans was initiated by ecologic information from the and so however young scientific discipline of epidemiology obtained past studies in African, Asian, and Mediterranean countries. These data showed that populations living in these regions had, on average, the lowest rates of nutrition-related noncommunicable diseases and lived a rather long life (7–9). Traditional Asian and Mediterranean diets are largely based on institute foods, suggesting that a plant-based diet provides wellness benefits beyond supplying nutrients in adequate amounts.

This heralded the replacement of one conceptual world view past some other, commonly called a paradigm shift. The recognition of this image shift toward vegetarian diets was first documented by Joan Sabaté of Loma Linda Academy (10, 11). This prototype shift took place in various phases and was illustrated by Sabaté in 3 graphical models. The models depict the expected health risks and benefits of populations adhering to either a meat-based diet or a vegetarian diet. The models are a description of the celebrated progression of the scientific understanding of the effects of these 2 singled-out diets.

Stage 1

The first model shows that in the 1960s (and actually prevailing through the 1970s), a population post-obit a vegetarian diet was thought to exist at a college risk of developing a nutrient deficiency than a population adhering to a meat-based diet. It is of import to note that in this model the potential benefits of a vegetarian diet, such every bit the prevention of chronic and degenerative diseases, were not included (Effigy 1).

Figure one.

Early model on the adequacy of vegetarian diets that prevailed through the 1960s. The area under each curve represents the proportion of individuals in a population for which a given diet pattern may be adequate or deficient. The variable

Early model on the capability of vegetarian diets that prevailed through the 1960s. The surface area nether each curve represents the proportion of individuals in a population for which a given diet pattern may be adequate or deficient. The variable "n" on the y-axis represents the number of individuals in a population following a diet that results in a health outcome, either disease or health. Reprinted with permission from reference xi.

FIGURE 1.

Early model on the adequacy of vegetarian diets that prevailed through the 1960s. The area under each curve represents the proportion of individuals in a population for which a given diet pattern may be adequate or deficient. The variable

Early model on the capability of vegetarian diets that prevailed through the 1960s. The area under each curve represents the proportion of individuals in a population for which a given diet pattern may exist adequate or scarce. The variable "north" on the y-axis represents the number of individuals in a population following a diet that results in a health outcome, either disease or health. Reprinted with permission from reference 11.

Remarkably, this cess was non based on the available observation that people in some Asian countries had consumed vegetarian diets for millennia without nutrient deficiencies, equally long as they had enough to eat. This assessment was based on the longstanding ascertainment that in poor countries with widespread malnutrition, diets consisted mostly of plant foods. This blazon of malnutrition, nevertheless, is largely attributable to poverty, which leads to an unbalanced diet (12, thirteen). The fact that some vegetarians with medical issues came to the attention of the media and that some children in Western countries consuming vegan or macrobiotic diets were indeed malnourished (fourteen, fifteen) fostered the conventionalities and the widespread prejudice of the inadequacy of vegetarian diets. This cultural bias against vegetarian nutrition was besides in accordance with the mainstream opinion at that time that vegetarian diets would atomic number 82 to malnutrition (fifteen).

Stage 2

During the 1980s and the 1990s, numerous nutritional epidemiologic studies documented the benefits of vegetarian and other plant-based diets (4, 16–19). In particular, the reduction in the risks of many chronic and degenerative diseases (obesity, ischemic heart disease, diabetes, and certain cancers) and full mortality, every bit well as increased longevity, were attributed to the greater amount and variety of plant foods and their various components, likewise as to the absenteeism of meat. Protective effects were consistently shown for diets of plant origin, whereas detrimental effects were correlated with the amount of meat consumed. It appeared that the positive effects of plant foods for disease prevention were more important than the adverse effects of meat consumption. This knowledge did not quite convince the greater scientific community, equally depicted in the 2d model, which represents the general opinion of the concluding decades of the 20th century (Figure two).

Figure 2.

The model on population health risks and benefits of vegetarian and meat-based diets that prevailed during the 1980s and 1990s. The area under each curve represents the proportion of individuals in a population for which a given diet pattern may be a health risk or benefit. The area in the center represents the proportion of individuals for which the diet is optimal or most beneficial. The variable

The model on population health risks and benefits of vegetarian and meat-based diets that prevailed during the 1980s and 1990s. The area under each bend represents the proportion of individuals in a population for which a given diet pattern may be a health risk or do good. The area in the center represents the proportion of individuals for which the diet is optimal or most beneficial. The variable "n" on the y-centrality represents the number of individuals in a population following a diet that results in a health result, either illness or wellness. Reprinted with permission from reference xi.

FIGURE 2.

The model on population health risks and benefits of vegetarian and meat-based diets that prevailed during the 1980s and 1990s. The area under each curve represents the proportion of individuals in a population for which a given diet pattern may be a health risk or benefit. The area in the center represents the proportion of individuals for which the diet is optimal or most beneficial. The variable

The model on population wellness risks and benefits of vegetarian and meat-based diets that prevailed during the 1980s and 1990s. The area nether each curve represents the proportion of individuals in a population for which a given nutrition blueprint may be a health risk or benefit. The area in the center represents the proportion of individuals for which the nutrition is optimal or most beneficial. The variable "n" on the y-centrality represents the number of individuals in a population following a diet that results in a wellness outcome, either disease or health. Reprinted with permission from reference 11.

As indicated in Figure 2, the available evidence from studies in vegetarians was ignored to a big extent and skepticism toward a vegetarian diet still constituted the prevailing view. This is shown in Figure 2 past the minimal extent to which the potential risk of nutrient deficiency was reduced compared with that shown in Effigy 1 for a vegetarian diet. A novel aspect of the model in Figure 2 was a small increase in disease gamble associated with a vegetarian diet attributable to obesity in sedentary vegetarians consuming more ready-to-eat constitute foods that unremarkably contain high amounts of depression-quality fatty or monosaccharides or salt (11). The risk of nutrient deficiency associated with a meat-based diet was only slightly increased because of the rather unbalanced nutrient composition of fast nutrient and other nutrient-poor diets (11). Affliction risk increased essentially on the footing of the increase in obesity in adults and children akin in sedentary populations worldwide, particularly for those living in affluent circumstances (eleven, 20).

Phase iii

At the time of the conception of the models at the turn of the century, model 2 showed the then existing opinion. On the ground of increasingly robust scientific information on vegetarian diets, a new paradigm emerged (Figure 3).

FIGURE three.

The model that prevails today. The area under the curve represents the proportion of individuals in a population for which a given diet pattern may be a health risk or benefit (optimal). At both extremes of the health continuum, there is risk of disease for deficiency or excess of nutrients or other food compounds. The area in the center represents the proportion of individuals for which the diet is optimal or most beneficial. The variable

The model that prevails today. The area nether the curve represents the proportion of individuals in a population for which a given diet pattern may exist a health risk or benefit (optimal). At both extremes of the wellness continuum, there is risk of disease for deficiency or excess of nutrients or other food compounds. The expanse in the center represents the proportion of individuals for which the diet is optimal or nearly beneficial. The variable "northward" on the y-axis represents the number of individuals in a population post-obit a diet that results in a health outcome, either disease or wellness. Reprinted with permission from reference 11.

Figure 3.

The model that prevails today. The area under the curve represents the proportion of individuals in a population for which a given diet pattern may be a health risk or benefit (optimal). At both extremes of the health continuum, there is risk of disease for deficiency or excess of nutrients or other food compounds. The area in the center represents the proportion of individuals for which the diet is optimal or most beneficial. The variable

The model that prevails today. The area under the curve represents the proportion of individuals in a population for which a given diet design may exist a health risk or benefit (optimal). At both extremes of the health continuum, there is risk of disease for deficiency or backlog of nutrients or other food compounds. The area in the heart represents the proportion of individuals for which the diet is optimal or well-nigh beneficial. The variable "n" on the y-axis represents the number of individuals in a population following a nutrition that results in a health result, either disease or wellness. Reprinted with permission from reference 11.

Model iii was based on increasing epidemiologic, clinical, and bones science information showing numerous health advantages of vegetarian diets (two, 4, 21), peculiarly those associated with the increasing recognition of the various benefits of antioxidants in the form of phytochemicals (22–24). As the term implies, phytochemicals are synthesized by plants just and are just nowadays in minimal amounts in animal products. At present, we know a fair amount, but certainly not everything, near phytochemicals and their metabolic roles. Plants synthesize phytochemicals for many of their functions; and on the basis of data from basic and clinical science and studies in animals and tissue cultures, our body uses these substances in various functions (22) (Effigy iv). The reduction in the occurrence of cardiovascular diseases and certain cancers in populations consuming a vegetarian diet is ascribed in part to these bioactive establish compounds (25). Conversely, some experts consider that meat-based diets cause a phytochemical deficiency (26).

FIGURE 4.

Functions of phytochemicals. Reprinted with permission from reference 22.

Functions of phytochemicals. Reprinted with permission from reference 22.

FIGURE 4.

Functions of phytochemicals. Reprinted with permission from reference 22.

Functions of phytochemicals. Reprinted with permission from reference 22.

Model 3 is no longer a projection into the future but has go reality and represents the current agreement. The available data have confirmed the wellness benefits of vegetarian diets (18, 19, 27–32).

VEGETARIAN NUTRITION TODAY

Today, vegetarian nutrition has a growing international post-obit. The increase in the number of vegetarians and vegans is attributable to health concerns and is also attributable to ethical, ecology, and social concerns. Vegetarians even so remain a minor minority in all countries except for Bharat, where approximately i-tertiary of the population is vegetarian. The information apropos the number of vegetarians is based on census data but besides on intelligent "guess-timates" (Table iii). The data show that ~ten% of vegetarians are vegans; the number of vegans is increasing more apace than those of vegetarians.

TABLE 3

Numbers of vegetarians in selected countries 1

Country Population No. of vegetarians Proportion of vegetarians
Millio n One thousand thousand %
India 1260 450 35
Italy 61 5.9 nine
Great Britain 63 5.4 ix
Federal republic of germany 82 7.4 9
Netherlands 17 0.vii 4
United States 320 12.ane 4
Canada 35 1.iii 4
Republic of austria viii 0.25 3
Switzerland 8 0.23 3
France 64 1.2 two
Country Population No. of vegetarians Proportion of vegetarians
Millio n Meg %
Republic of india 1260 450 35
Italy 61 5.9 nine
Nifty United kingdom 63 five.4 9
Germany 82 7.4 9
Netherlands 17 0.7 iv
United States 320 12.1 4
Canada 35 1.three four
Austria eight 0.25 3
Switzerland 8 0.23 three
France 64 1.2 2

1

Information based on average values of unlike censuses of different vegetarian societies. In Africa, Eastern Europe, and S America, the number of vegetarians is more often than not <1%. See references 33 and 34.

TABLE iii

Numbers of vegetarians in selected countries 1

Land Population No. of vegetarians Proportion of vegetarians
Millio north Meg %
India 1260 450 35
Italy 61 five.9 ix
Slap-up Great britain 63 5.iv 9
Frg 82 7.4 9
Netherlands 17 0.7 4
U.s. 320 12.1 4
Canada 35 1.three 4
Austria 8 0.25 3
Switzerland 8 0.23 3
France 64 i.2 two
State Population No. of vegetarians Proportion of vegetarians
Millio n Million %
India 1260 450 35
Italia 61 5.ix ix
Uk 63 5.iv ix
Germany 82 7.4 9
Netherlands 17 0.7 4
United States 320 12.i four
Canada 35 one.3 4
Austria 8 0.25 3
Switzerland 8 0.23 3
French republic 64 1.ii 2

i

Data based on average values of different censuses of different vegetarian societies. In Africa, Eastern Europe, and South America, the number of vegetarians is mostly <1%. See references 33 and 34.

The vegetarian motion is now supported by many leaders in the arts, sciences, music, and sports. In improver to the growing number of vegetarians and vegans, increasingly more than people in Western countries continue to reduce their meat consumption. This tin can be documented by the average amount of meat consumed in a state such as Deutschland, where the consumption of meat has decreased by well-nigh x% in the past 30 y (35). By comparison, meat consumption is still increasing in the United States and in well-nigh emerging economies (36, 37).

Today, many vegetarians are non fully enlightened of the wellness potential of establish diets. In add-on, those who follow a vegetarian diet because of concern for animals or the environment may not be enlightened of potential nutrient deficiencies. Following are 3 areas of importance for nutrition education for vegetarians.

  • 1) An private's decision to change to a vegetarian way of life affects the quality of his or her nutritional status. The extent of nutrient deficiencies is higher in persons who become vegetarians for intellectual (ethical, moral, religious, spiritual) and social (ecologic, economical, political) reasons compared with those who turn to vegetarianism for physical (health, hygiene, toxicology, concrete performance) reasons (33). The latter are primarily concerned virtually their health, and they wish to obtain information as to how to properly prepare vegetarian meals. The former worry more about the fate of animals, and they proceed their previous dietary habits with the exception of omitting meat and maybe other animal products from their diets (38).

  • two) Vegetarians are not ever aware of the fact that food is best eaten in its natural course or minimally processed. Nutrient losses by food processing, such as milling and heating, are considerable and are commonly unknown to consumers. For example, nutrients lost past producing white flour from grain are immense (Table 4). Bread, cakes, noodles, and pasta made from whole grains reduce claret cholesterol concentrations and subtract the adventure of cancers of the digestive tract (25). This effect is mainly attributable to the college dietary cobweb content of whole-grain foods. However, isolated dietary fibers added to meals do not have the same effect.

  • 3) The wellness benefits of raw foods may be underestimated by vegetarians. Raw foods do not lose any nutrients by processing and need to be chewed thoroughly to procure the full benefit of their inherent nutritional value. Chewing also stimulates salivation and cleanses the teeth. Raw nutrient increases satiety, supports digestion, and normalizes gut transit time. Last, but not least, raw nutrient prevents overeating (40). The recommendations for raw nutrient intake vary widely and range from most no raw food (Ayurveda) to 100% raw food (strict raw nutrient eaters). The German Nutrition Society recommends an intake of 100 yard raw food/d (41). The concept of wholesome nutrition recommends that approximately half the food consumed should be raw (42). Information technology is worth noting that raw nutrient may not always provide full health benefits. For example, certain phytochemicals (eg, β-carotene, lycopene) are absorbed to a much larger extent from cooked vegetables than from raw vegetables (24).

  • 4) Some of the uncertainties voiced past vegetarians are related to the widely differing recommendations for critical nutrients across countries. Critical nutrients are those that are most frequently identified equally not being supplied in sufficient amounts in certain population subgroups (Table v). Unexpectedly, there are only modest differences in what constitutes a critical nutrient between meat eaters and vegetarians because nigh critical nutrients are the same for both groups. One exception is folate, which is considered a critical food for meat eaters but presents no trouble for vegetarians and vegans. In add-on, vitamin B-12 and peradventure the n–3 fatty acids are critical for vegans and for some, merely not all, meat eaters or lactoovovegetarians.

TABLE four

Food losses attributable to processing grain ane

Whole-repast flour (=100%) compared with white flour Reduction
%
Dietary fiber 58
Folate 61
Iron 62
Thiamin 78
Zinc 79
Magnesium ninety
Selenium 92
Whole-meal flour (=100%) compared with white flour Reduction
%
Dietary fiber 58
Folate 61
Fe 62
Thiamin 78
Zinc 79
Magnesium 90
Selenium 92

TABLE 4

Nutrient losses attributable to processing grain 1

Whole-repast flour (=100%) compared with white flour Reduction
%
Dietary fiber 58
Folate 61
Iron 62
Thiamin 78
Zinc 79
Magnesium 90
Selenium 92
Whole-meal flour (=100%) compared with white flour Reduction
%
Dietary fiber 58
Folate 61
Atomic number 26 62
Thiamin 78
Zinc 79
Magnesium 90
Selenium 92

TABLE 5

Potential critical nutrients in the average population of Western countries

Food Groups at risk 1 (group averages)
Iron Especially girls and immature women
Iodine Only 70% of the official recommendation is attained
Zinc Particularly children and senior citizens
Calcium Especially the immature and the old
Vitamin D Depending on synthesis in the pare
Folate Especially vegetable avoiders
n–3 Fat acids Only 50% of the official recommendation is attained
Nutrient Groups at risk 1 (grouping averages)
Iron Especially girls and young women
Iodine Simply 70% of the official recommendation is attained
Zinc Peculiarly children and senior citizens
Calcium Specially the young and the old
Vitamin D Depending on synthesis in the skin
Folate Particularly vegetable avoiders
due north–three Fatty acids But l% of the official recommendation is attained

i

Common at-risk groups with increased nutrient requirements: children, pregnant and nursing women, the elderly, and the ill. See references 34 and 43.

TABLE v

Potential critical nutrients in the average population of Western countries

Food Groups at gamble one (group averages)
Iron Specially girls and young women
Iodine Only 70% of the official recommendation is attained
Zinc Especially children and senior citizens
Calcium Especially the young and the erstwhile
Vitamin D Depending on synthesis in the skin
Folate Especially vegetable avoiders
n–iii Fatty acids Just 50% of the official recommendation is attained
Nutrient Groups at risk 1 (group averages)
Iron Especially girls and young women
Iodine Only 70% of the official recommendation is attained
Zinc Especially children and senior citizens
Calcium Specially the young and the old
Vitamin D Depending on synthesis in the peel
Folate Especially vegetable avoiders
n–3 Fatty acids Merely fifty% of the official recommendation is attained

1

Common at-adventure groups with increased nutrient requirements: children, pregnant and nursing women, the elderly, and the sick. See references 34 and 43.

Whether a nutrient is considered critical depends to a large extent on the respective nutrient recommendations, which differ between countries. For instance, if the assessment of calcium status is based on the German recommendation, the percentage of vegans that ingest an insufficient corporeality of calcium in a detail group amounts to >ninety%, but using the UK recommendation the charge per unit drops to <ten%. A similar scenario applies with vitamin B-12 (Table 6). It is interesting to note that the unlike recommendations are based on the same international scientific information. Notwithstanding, recommendations for a specific country are fabricated on the footing of the circumstances of that detail population. Less variation in recommendations would eliminate some of the controversies and fears associated with an inadequate nutrient supply for vegetarians and especially vegans. Ultimately, the adequacy of a nutrition depends on the foods that are consumed and not on the name of the nutrition. To summarize, vegetarians need as much nutrition teaching as the rest of the population.

Table vi

Current recommendations for intakes of calcium and vitamin B-12 in selected countries 1

Country Calcium Vitamin B-12 Reference or source
mg/d μg/d
United kingdom 500 one.five 43
Japan 600 2.4 Japanese Society of Nutrition and Nutrient Science 2
Canada 700 2.4 Canadian Nutrition Society three
Us 800 2.4 44
Germany grand 3.0 45
Country Calcium Vitamin B-12 Reference or source
mg/d μg/d
United kingdom 500 one.5 43
Japan 600 2.4 Japanese Society of Nutrition and Food Science 2
Canada 700 2.4 Canadian Nutrition Society 3
Usa 800 two.4 44
Frg 1000 3.0 45

1

Values are for adults twenty–l y of age. Data are from references 43 and 44.

2

Y Nishida, personal communication, 4 Dec 2013.

iii

H Delisle, personal communication, 6 December 2013.

TABLE 6

Current recommendations for intakes of calcium and vitamin B-12 in selected countries ane

Country Calcium Vitamin B-12 Reference or source
mg/d μg/d
Great britain 500 ane.five 43
Nippon 600 ii.four Japanese Society of Diet and Food Scientific discipline 2
Canada 700 2.four Canadian Diet Society 3
United States 800 2.iv 44
Frg 1000 three.0 45
Country Calcium Vitamin B-12 Reference or source
mg/d μg/d
United Kingdom 500 one.5 43
Japan 600 2.4 Japanese Society of Nutrition and Food Scientific discipline 2
Canada 700 two.iv Canadian Nutrition Society 3
Usa 800 two.4 44
Federal republic of germany 1000 3.0 45

1

Values are for adults 20–50 y of age. Data are from references 43 and 44.

2

Y Nishida, personal communication, 4 December 2013.

3

H Delisle, personal advice, half-dozen Dec 2013.

THE FUTURE OF VEGETARIAN NUTRITION

The future of vegetarian diet is promising. On the one hand, there are an increasing number of food scandals that usually concern animal-derived foods. This causes a loss of conviction in these products. On the other hand, in that location is a growing awareness of the numerous long-term positive effects of a vegetarian fashion of life. These positive effects are part of the new science field of study of diet ecology (46, 44) and of the concept of the "new diet science" (48). Both concepts are driven by the urgent demand to seriously consider sustainability in the food chain every bit well equally in all human activities. A summary of these 2 new concepts is found in the Giessen Declaration (49).

There are iv specific reasons why the future of vegetarian nutrition is promising, as follows:

  • 1) Ethical, moral, religious, and spiritual reasons: people no longer desire animals to suffer a miserable life just to satisfy the appetite of meat eaters. Industrial animal product should be discontinued. Organic farming should be supported.

  • 2) Ecologic, economic, and political reasons: people neither want a destruction of the foundation of life on our planet nor do they want the climate to change (46, 50–52). Waste and excesses need to be kept to a minimum. A new principle of prudency is indispensable.

  • iii) Wellness and hygienic reasons: people no longer desire to suffer from preventable, nutrition-related, noncommunicable diseases. The take a chance of contemporary diseases tin be essentially reduced by a vegetarian way of life.

  • four) Sustainability and peace reasons: people want continued quality of life combined with responsibleness for themselves, their children, and generations to come up. Mindfulness is called for (46, 50, 51).

Albert Einstein nicely summed upwards his view about the futurity: "For the weak it is the unattainable, for the scared it is the unknown, for the brave it is the opportunity." Nosotros are challenged and obligated to take the responsibility for the opportunities that are inherent in a vegetarian manner of life.

The author had no conflicts of interest to declare.

FOOTNOTES

2

Presented at the symposium "Sixth International Congress on Vegetarian Nutrition" held in Colina Linda, CA, 24–26 February 2013.

REFERENCES

1.

Milton

Thou

.

The critical function played past animal source foods in human (Human) evolution

.

J Nutr

2003

;

133

(

suppl

):

3886S

92S

.

2.

Boeing

H

,

Bechthold

A

,

Bub

A

,

Ellinger

Southward

,

Haller

D

,

Kroke

A

,

Leschik-Bonnet

E

,

Müller

MJ

,

Oberritter

H

,

Schulze

G

et al.

Critical review: vegetables and fruit in the prevention of chronic diseases

.

Eur J Nutr

2012

;

51

:

637

63

.

3.

Gil

A

,

Ortega

RM

,

Maldonado

J

.

Wholegrain cereals and breadstuff: a duet of the Mediterranean nutrition for the prevention of chronic diseases

.

Public Health Nutr

2011

;

14

:

2316

22

.

4.

Hu

FB

.

Plant-based foods and prevention of cardiovascular disease: an overview

.

Am J Clin Nutr

2003

;

78

(

suppl

):

544S

51S

.

5.

Martin

C

,

Zhang

Y

,

Tonelli

C

,

Petroni

K

.

Plants, nutrition, and health

.

Annu Rev Plant Biol

2013

;

64

:

nineteen

46

.

six.

Spencer

C

.

Hanover, NH

:

Chow Street

,

2001

.

7.

Burkitt

DP

,

Trowell

HC

.

Dietary fibre and Western diseases

.

Ir Med J

1977

;

lxx

:

272

7

.

8.

Keys

A

.

Cambridge, MA

:

Harvard University Press

,

1980

.

nine.

Trowell

HC

,

Burkitt

DP

. .

London, Great britain

:

Edward Arnold

,

1981

.

10.

Sabaté

J

.

The public health hazard-to-benefit ratio of vegetarian diets: irresolute paradigms

In:

Sabaté

J

ed.

Boca Raton, FL

:

CRC Press

,

2001

:

19

30

.

xi.

Sabaté

J

.

The contribution of vegetarian diets to health and disease: a paradigm shift?

Am J Clin Nutr

2003

;

78

(

suppl

):

502S

7S

.

12.

Leitzmann

C

,

Oltersdorf

U

.

[Possibilities to improve the nutrition situation in developing countries.]

Cologne, Federal republic of germany

:

Weltforum

,

1981

(in German language)

.

13.

Glasauer

P

,

Leitzmann

C

.

Stuttgart, Federal republic of germany

:

Diakonisches Werk

,

1982

.

14.

Dagnelie

PC

,

van Staveren

WA

.

Macrobiotic diet and kid wellness: results of a population-based, mixed-longitudinal accomplice study in The Netherlands

.

Am J Clin Nutr

1994

;

59

(

suppl

):

1187S

96S

.

xv.

MacLean

WC

,

Graham

GG

.

Vegetarianism in children

.

Am J Dis Child

1980

;

134

:

513

nine

.

xvi.

Appleby

PN

,

Thorogood

M

,

Isle of man

JI

,

Key

T

.

Low body mass index in non-meat-eaters: the possible roles of animal fatty, dietary fibre and alcohol

.

Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord

1998

;

22

:

454

threescore

.

17.

Fraser

GE

.

Association betwixt nutrition and cancer, ischemic heart disease, and all-cause mortality in non-Hispanic white California 7th-twenty-four hour period Adventist

.

Am J Clin Nutr

1999

;

70

(

suppl

):

532S

8S

.

eighteen.

Key

TJ

,

Appleby

PN

,

Spencer

EA

,

Travis

RC

,

Roddam

AW

,

Allen

NE

.

Mortality in British vegetarians: results from the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (Ballsy-Oxford)

.

Am J Clin Nutr

2009

;

89

(

suppl

):

1613S

9S

.

nineteen.

Tonstad

S

,

Stewart

K

,

Oda

K

,

Batech

One thousand

,

Herring

RP

,

Fraser

GE

.

Vegetarian diets and incidence of diabetes in the Adventist Health Study-ii

.

Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis

2013

;

23

:

292

9

.

20.

Ezzati

G

,

Riboli

E

.

Behavioral and dietary gamble factors for noncommunicable diseases

.

Due north Engl J Med

2013

;

369

:

954

64

.

21.

Marsh

K

,

Zeuschner

C

,

Saunders

A

.

Health implications of a vegetarian diet: a review

.

Am J Lifestyle Med

2012

;

half-dozen

:

250

67

.

22.

Watzl

B

,

Leitzmann

C

.

[Phytochemicals in food.]

3rd ed.

Stuttgart, Germany

:

Hippokrates

,

2005

(in High german).

23.

González-Vallinas

Thou

,

González-Castejón

M

,

Rodríguez-Casado

A

,

Ramírez de Molina

A

.

Dietary phytochemicals in cancer prevention and therapy: a complementary approach with promising perspectives

.

Nutr Rev

2013

;

71

:

585

99

.

24.

Nile

SH

,

Park

SW

.

Edible berries: review on bioactive components and their effect on human health

.

Nutrition

2014

;

xxx

:

134

44

.

25.

World Cancer Research Fund/American Constitute for Cancer Inquiry

.

Food, diet, concrete action, and the prevention of cancer: a global perspective

.

Washington, DC

:

AICR

,

2007

.

26.

Pan

A

,

Schulze

MB

,

Stampfer

MJ

,

Sunday

Q

,

Willett

WC

,

Bernstein

AM

,

Manson

JE

,

Hu

FB

.

Red meat consumption and mortality: results from 2 prospective accomplice studies

.

Arch Intern Med

2012

;

172

:

555

63

.

27.

Leitzmann

C

.

Vegetarian diets: what are the advantages?

In:

Elmadfa

I

, ed.

Forum nutrition 57: nutrition diversification and health promotion

.

Basel, Switzerland

:

Karger

,

2005

:

147

56

.

28.

Craig

WJ

.

Health furnishings of vegan diets

.

Am J Clin Nutr

2009

;

89

(

suppl

):

1627S

33S

.

29.

Crowe

FL

,

Appleby

PN

,

Travis

RC

,

Key

TJ

.

Risk of hospitalization or death from ischemic heart disease among British vegetarians and nonvegetarians: results from the Epic-Oxford cohort written report

.

Am J Clin Nutr

2013

;

97

:

597

603

.

30.

Orlich

MJ

,

Singh

PN

,

Sabaté

J

,

Jaceldo-Siegl

K

,

Fan

J

,

Knutsen

S

,

Beeson

WL

,

Fraser

GE

.

Vegetarian dietary patterns and mortality in Adventist Wellness Study 2

.

JAMA Intern Med

2013

;

173

:

1230

eight

.

31.

Pettersen

BJ

,

Anousheh

R

,

Fan

J

,

Jaceldo-Siegl

1000

,

Fraser

GE

.

Vegetarian diets and blood force per unit area amongst white subjects: results from the Adventist Health Report-two (AHS-two)

.

Public Wellness Nutr

2012

;

15

:

1909

16

.

32.

Tantamango-Bartley

Y

,

Jaceldo-Siegl

K

,

Fan

J

,

Fraser

G

.

Vegetarian diets and the incidence of cancer in a low-risk population

.

Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev

2013

;

22

:

286

94

.

33.

Leitzmann

C

,

Keller

M

.

[Vegetarian nutrition.]

3rd ed.

Stuttgart, Deutschland

:

Ulmer

,

2013

(in German language)

.

34.

The Vegetarian Resource Grouping

.

.

35.

Deutscher Fleischer-Verband (High german Butcher'due south Association)

.

Geschäftsbericht. [Annual report.]

Frankfurt, Germany

: Deutscher Fleischer-Verband,

2012

:

41

(in German)

.

36.

Daniel

CR

,

Cross

AJ

,

Koebnick

C

,

Sinha

R

.

Trends in meat consumption in the United states

.

Public Wellness Nutr

2011

;

xiv

:

575

83

.

37.

Delgado

CL

.

Rising consumption of meat and milk in developing countries has created a new food revolution

.

J Nutr

2003

;

133

(

suppl

):

3907S

10S

.

38.

Waldmann

A

,

Koschizke

JW

,

Leitzmann

C

,

Hahn

A

.

Dietary intakes and lifestyle factors of a vegan population in Germany: results from the German Vegan Study

.

Eur J Clin Nutr

2003

;

57

:

947

55

.

39.

Souci

SW

,

Fachmann

W

,

Kraut

H

.

[The composition of foods. Nutrition tables.]

. 7th ed.

Boca Raton, FL

:

CRC Printing

,

2008

(in German language)

.

xl.

Koebnick

C

,

Garcia

AL

,

Dagnelie

PC

,

Strassner

C

,

Lindemans

J

,

Katz

Northward

,

Leitzmann

C

,

Hoffmann

I

.

Long-term consumption of a raw food diet is associated with favorable serum LDL cholesterol and triglycerides but also with elevated plasma homocysteine and low serum HDL cholesterol in humans

.

J Nutr

2005

;

135

:

2372

8

.

41.

Oberritter

H

,

Schäbethal

1000

,

von Ruesten

A

,

Boeing

H

.

The DGE Nutrition Circle—presentation and basis of the food-related recommendations from the German language Nutrition Social club (DGE)

.

Ernaehrungs-Umschau International

2013

;

2

:

24

29

.

42.

Koerber

KV

,

Maennle

T

,

Leitzmann

C

.

Vollwert-Ernährung

. [Wholesome nutrition.] 11th ed.

Stuttgart, Germany

:

Haug

,

2012

(in German).

43.

Department of Health

.

Dietary reference values for food free energy and nutrients for the United kingdom

. No. 41.

London, United Kingdom

:

Section of Health Britain

2006

.

44.

Establish of Medicine, Nutrient and Nutrition Board

.

Dietary Reference Intakes for calcium and vitamin D

.

Washington, DC

:

The National Academies Press

,

2008

.

45.

Deutsche Gesellschaft für Ernährung, österreichische Gesellschaft für Ernährung, Schweizerische Gesellschaft für Ernährungsforschung, Schweizerische Vereinigung für Ernährung, eds

.

Reference values for nutrient intake

.

Frankfurt, Germany

:

Umschau Braus

,

2002

(in German)

.

46.

Leitzmann

C

.

Nutrition ecology: the contributions of vegetarian diets

.

Am J Clin Nutr

2003

;

78

(

suppl

):

657S

9S

.

47.

Hoffmann

I

,

Schneider

1000

,

Leitzmann

C

, eds.

Ernährungsökologie. [Nutrition environmental.]

Munich, Deutschland

:

Oekom

,

2011

(in German)

.

48.

Leitzmann

C

,

Cannon

Thousand

, eds.

The new nutrition science

.

Publ Health Nutr

2005

;

8

(

6A

):

667

804

.

49.

The Giessen Declaration

.

Public Health Nutr

2005

;

8

(

6A

):

783

6

.

50.

FAO

.

Livestock's long shadow: environmental issues and options

.

Rome, Italy

:

FAO

,

2006

.

51.

Marlow

HJ

,

Hayes

WK

,

Soret

South

,

Carter

RL

,

Schwab

ER

,

Sabaté

J

.

Diet and the environment: does what you lot eat thing?

Am J Clin Nutr

2009

;

89

(

suppl

):

1699S

703S

.

52.

Macdiarmid

JI

,

Kyle

J

,

Horgan

GW

,

Loe

J

,

Fyfe

C

,

Johnstone

A

,

McNeill

Chiliad

.

Sustainable diets for the future: can we contribute to reducing greenhouse gas emissions past eating a healthy diet?

Am J Clin Nutr

2012

;

96

:

632

9

.